Resume Rejection3 min read

Resume Bullet Points and ATS: How to Format Bullets for Parsing

Bullet points are the backbone of effective resume writing, but the wrong bullet format can cause parsing issues. Standard bullets parse perfectly; custom symbols, nested lists, and creative markers may confuse the ATS or be replaced with garbled characters. Here's how to format bullets for maximum ATS compatibility.

How ATS Reads Bullet Points

ATS parsers recognize bullet points as list items within a section. The parser uses the bullet character and formatting to identify where one item ends and the next begins. Standard round bullets (•), hyphens (-), and basic formatting are universally recognized.

The content within each bullet is extracted as text and scored for keyword matches. Well-written bullets that contain relevant keywords, quantified achievements, and action verbs provide the best ATS scoring potential.

Some parsers also associate bullet content with the job entry above them, linking your achievements to specific positions. This helps the ATS understand which skills and accomplishments belong to which role.

Best Bullet Formats for ATS

Standard round bullets (•) are the safest choice. These are created by using the standard list feature in Microsoft Word or Google Docs. Hyphens (-) and simple dashes are also universally compatible.

Avoid custom bullet characters like ★, ➤, ▸, ✓, or ◆. While they look distinctive, some parsers replace them with unrecognized character symbols or skip them entirely. This can cause your bullet points to merge into one continuous paragraph.

Never use images or icons as bullet markers. These are invisible to the parser, and your content may appear as a continuous text block without any list structure.

Bullet TypeATS CompatibilityExample
Standard round (•)Excellent• Managed team of 12 engineers
Hyphen (-)Excellent- Increased revenue by 25%
Em dash (—)Good— Led product launch initiative
Arrow (→, ➤)RiskyMay not be recognized
Star/check (★, ✓)PoorOften replaced with garbled chars
Icon/imageZeroInvisible to parser

Writing ATS-Optimized Bullets

Beyond formatting, the content of your bullets affects ATS scoring. Start each bullet with a strong action verb that matches the job description's language. If the posting says 'manage,' use 'Managed' not 'Oversaw.'

Include relevant keywords naturally within each bullet. 'Developed RESTful APIs using Python and Django, deploying to AWS' contains multiple scorable keywords in a natural sentence.

Quantify achievements whenever possible. Numbers don't directly affect ATS scoring, but they make your bullets more compelling during the human review stage. 'Reduced deployment time by 40% through CI/CD pipeline optimization' is both keyword-rich and impactful.

Pro Tips

1

Use standard round bullets (•) or hyphens (-) for guaranteed ATS compatibility

2

Start each bullet with an action verb that matches the job description's language

3

Include 1-2 relevant keywords per bullet point naturally within the achievement statement

4

Keep bullets to 1-2 lines for optimal readability and parsing

5

Quantify achievements with numbers, percentages, and dollar amounts where possible

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Using custom Unicode bullet characters that parsers don't recognize

Writing paragraph-length bullets that are harder to parse and harder for humans to scan

Starting bullets with 'Responsible for' instead of action verbs

Not including keywords in bullet points, relying only on the skills section for matching

Frequently Asked Questions

How many bullet points should each job have?
3-6 bullets per position is optimal. Fewer than 3 doesn't provide enough content for ATS keyword matching. More than 8 makes the section dense and hard to scan during human review.
Should I use full sentences or fragments for bullets?
Fragments starting with action verbs are the resume standard: 'Led team of 12' rather than 'I led a team of 12 people.' Fragments are more scannable and ATS parsers handle both equally well.
Do nested bullet points work with ATS?
Nested bullets (sub-bullets) can cause parsing issues with some ATS platforms. The parser may not correctly identify the hierarchy, potentially merging sub-bullets with the wrong parent item. Keep to a single level of bullets for safety.

Related Guides

Create perfectly formatted bullet points with our Resume Builder

More ATS Guides