Experienced professionals have a natural ATS advantage — you have years of real experience to embed keywords in. However, many senior candidates ironically score lower on ATS tests because their resumes prioritize leadership narratives over keyword-rich content. The key is balancing strategic language with keyword optimization.
The optimal ATS section order for experienced professionals: Professional Summary (keyword-rich, 3-4 lines with role title, years, key skills, and top achievement), Core Competencies (a grid of 9-12 key skills — this is your primary keyword section), Work Experience (reverse-chronological with PAR-formula bullets), Education (brief — degree and institution only), Certifications (especially cloud, leadership, and domain certifications), and optionally Publications/Awards.
Keyword strategy at the senior level: Your experience bullets should naturally contain relevant keywords when you describe your actual work. But consciously verify that JD-specific terms appear in your resume. If the JD mentions 'microservices architecture' and you've worked with it but described it as 'distributed systems,' add the exact phrase. Your Core Competencies grid should mirror the JD's requirements section almost exactly.
Two-page formatting for ATS: ATS systems process all pages equally — there's no penalty for two pages. However, place your most important keywords and achievements on page one, as the parsed summary view that recruiters see often emphasizes page-one content. Use a clear page break between pages (not a gradual flow) and include your name on both pages. Keep formatting consistent across both pages.